1. The differential cost between standard construction and zero energy construction is higher in the US because the standard is cheaper (and lousier one might say, i.e. the base code requirements are lower)
2. The much lower cost of energy in the US makes it more difficult to amortize the extra cost for energy efficiency
3. Many of the products and technologies needed for energy efficient construction are not available in the US. This is a particular issue for government funded projects with a "Buy USA" requirement. It also drives cost up and uses energy for distant transport.
The new ASHRAE standard and strengthened LEED requirements for energy should take of item 1. For item 2 we need higher taxes on energy so that higher cost is coupled with a public benefit instead of just profits for energy and oil.
Item 3 will take care of itself once the other two are in effect.
New York Times Article
USA
Canada
Germany (deutsch)
Example: Oberlin College
| ||||
| ||||
Background: (from http://zeb.buildinggreen.com/overview.
Net Zero Energy Buildings
Last updated: 07-26-2011Within This Page
Introduction
Amid growing concerns about rising energy prices, energy independence, and the impact of climate change, statistics show buildings to be the primary energy consumer in the U.S. This fact underscores the importance of targeting building energy use as a key to decreasing the nation's energy consumption. The building sector can significantly reduce energy use by incorporating energy-efficient strategies into the design, construction, and operation of new buildings and undertaking retrofits to improve the efficiency of existing buildings. It can further reduce dependence on fossil fuel derived energy by increasing use of on-site and off-site renewable energy sources.
The concept of a Net Zero Energy Building (NZEB), one which produces as much energy as it uses over the course of a year, recently has been evolving from research to reality. Currently, there are only a small number of highly efficient buildings that meet the criteria to be called "Net Zero". As a result of advances in construction technologies, renewable energy systems, and academic research, creating Net Zero Energy buildings is becoming more and more feasible.
While the exact definitions of metrics for "net zero energy" vary (this is discussed below), most agree that Net Zero Energy Buildings combine:
- Exemplary building design to minimize energy requirements
- Renewable energy systems that meet these reduced energy needs.
DescriptionDefinitions
As the "zero energy" and "net zero energy" concepts are relatively new, there are not yet definitive, widely accepted zero-energy metrics. The Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) have spearheaded much of the work on net zero energy buildings to date. NREL presents several definitions for "net zero energy", and they encourage building designers, owners, and operators to select the metric that best fits their project. The NREL publication Zero Energy Buildings: A Critical Look at the Definition (PDF 477 KB) explores definitions in detail, and it suggests four ways in which net zero energy may be defined:
Net Zero Site Energy Net Zero Source Energy Net Zero Energy Costs Net Zero Energy Emissions Site Energy refers to the energy consumed and generated at a site (e.g. a building), regardless of where or how that energy originated. In a net zero site energy building, for every unit of energy the building consumes over a year, it must generate a unit of energy.
Source Energy refers to primary energy needed to extract and deliver energy to a site, including the energy that may be lost or wasted in the process of generation, transmission and distribution. For example, a coal-burning power plant may generate 1 Joule of electricity for every 3 Joules of energy in the coal consumed. If natural gas is used at a site, for every 20 Joules consumed, 1 Joule may be needed to extract and distribute the gas to the site. Metrics for net zero source energy buildings account for these factors, though exact metrics can vary depending on site and utility factors.
Net Zero Energy Cost is perhaps the simplest metric to use: it means that the building has an energy utility bill of $0 over the course of a year. In some cases, building owners or operators may take advantage of selling Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) from on-site renewable generation.
Many conventional energy sources result in emissions of carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, etc. A Net Zero Energy Emissions building either uses no energy which results in emissions or offsets the emissions by exporting emissions-free energy (typically from on-site renewable energy systems).
0 comments:
Post a Comment